Mock Test Paper 8 for Delhi Judicial Service Prelims, 2018
Instructions
Instructions
The duration of the paper is 2 hours 30 mins.
Every question carry equal marks, of 1 mark each and there is 0.25 negative marking.
Check the answers at the end of the post.
Ques. 1. Which of the following is not a decree?
May presume a fresh suit.
Every question carry equal marks, of 1 mark each and there is 0.25 negative marking.
Check the answers at the end of the post.
Ques. 1. Which of the following is not a decree?
- An order returning the plaint to be presented to the proper court.
- An order rejecting an application for an order to set aside ex parte decree.
- Rejection of a plaint.
- Both a and b.
- A concise statement of the case.
- Issues.
- Decision and reasons for it.
- All of the above.
- A surety.
- A person who is party to the suit, but no decree has been passed against him.
- Both a and b.
- Only a.
- Courts of Civil Judge.
- District Court.
- High Court.
- Both a and b.
- Interest republicae ut sit finis litium i.e. it is to the interest of the State that there be an end to litigation.
- Nemo debet lis vezari pro uno eteaden causa i.e. no one shall be vexed twice over for the same cause of action.
- Both 1 and 2.
- None of the above.
- Constructive res judicata.
- Res Judicata.
- Express res judicata.
- None of the above.
- The former suit was dismissed by the trial court for want of jurisdiction.
- The former suit was dismissed for default of plaintiff’s appearance.
- The former suit was dismissed on the ground of non-joinder or misjoinder of parties.
- All of the above.
- Only before the court of first instance at the earliest opportunity.
- Before the appellate court for the first time.
- Before the court of revision for the first time.
- None of the above.
- Any right to relief arises out of the same act in favour of such persons.
- Any common question of law or fact is involved.
- All persons have a common cause of action.
- All are correct.
- If it is unnecessary, scandalous, frivolous or vexatious.
- If it tends to prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of suit.
- If it is an abuse of the process of the court.
- All of the above.
- Order
- Application
- Pleading
- None of the above.
May presume a fresh suit.
- Cannot present a fresh suit.
- May present a fresh with the leave of High Court.
- None of the above.
- The plaintiff.
- The defendant.
- The party applying for the summons.
- The court.
- A reply to the plaint filed by the plaintiff.
- The pleading of the defendant or of the plaintiff in certain cases.
- Both 1 and 2.
- Only 1.
- 8 days.
- 9 days.
- 15 days.
- 7 days.
- Restoration of suit.
- Commencement of trial de novo.
- Evidence that had been recorded in the ex parte proceedings is taken into account.
- None of the above.
- Adjournments of suits.
- Stay of suits.
- Cross-examination of witness.
- Service of summons.
- Nine per cent per annum.
- Ten per cent per annum.
- Six per cent per annum.
- Twelve per cent annum.
- J&K.
- NEFA
- All UTs and States.
- Whole of India.
- Prosecution to sue the defendant.
- Plaintiff to prosecute the defendant.
- Plaintiff to sue the defendant.
- Prosecutor to prosecute the defendant.
- Guilty mind givens birth to crime.
- There can be no crime without a guilty mind.
- Crime is a child of guilty mind.
- Criminal mind leads to crime.
- Strict or absolute liability.
- Public nuisance.
- ’Ignorance of law is no excuse’-maxim.
- All are correct.
- Both A and B are liable for murder.
- Only A is liable for murder.
- Only B is liable for murder.
- None of these.
- Chapter VI.
- Chapter IV.
- Chapters IV and VI.
- Chapter VIII.
- A is guilty of murder.
- A is not guilty of any offence, as it was a case of pure accident under Section 80, IPC.
- A is guilty of criminal negligence.
- None of the above in correct.
- An act one with due care and attention.
- An actual belief that the act done is not contrary to law.
- An act, in fact, done honestly.
- An act done under bona fide belief.
- Necessity knows no law.
- Nothing is an offence done by a child under 7 years of age.
- Every person is liable for his own acts.
- Trifling acts do not constitute an offence.
- Reasonably causes apprehension that death will be caused.
- Reasonably causes an apprehension that simple injury will be caused.
- Is of escaping with stolen property immediately after the theft.
- Is of arresting a person who is running away after having committed an offence of voluntarily causing hurt.
- Rape.
- Gratifying unnatural lust.
- Causing miscarriage.
- Kidnapping.
- B commits theft and A abets theft.
- A commits no offence but B commits theft.
- Both A and B commit no offence.
- B does not commit any offence but A commits abetment of theft.
- Guilty of abetment of murder.
- Guilty of murder by instigation.
- Not guilty of abetment.
- None of the above.
- Giving false information.
- Offering, or causing to offer, or agreeing to offer, any gratifying of property in consideration.
- All of the above.
- All murders are culpable homicide but not vice versa.
- All culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 299).
- A murder can never be a culpable homicide.
- None of the above.
- Public Prosecutor vs. M. Suryanarayan Moorthy.
- Palani Goundan vs. Emperor.
- Rajwant Singh vs. State of Kerala.
- Virsa Singh vs. State of Punjab.
- No offence.
- Attempt to murder.
- Murder.
- Causing death by rash or negligent act.
- A is guilty of B’s murder.
- A is guilty of culpable homicide by negligence.
- A is guilty of grievous hurt.
- A is guilty only of pick pocketing.
- Simple hurt.
- Grievous hurt.
- Assault
- None of the above.
- Wrongful Restraint.
- Wrongful confinement.
- Both a and b.
- None of the above.
- Motive
- Preparation
- Conduct (previous or subsequent).
- All of the above.
- A party to the suit or proceeding.
- An agent authorized by a party.
- A party suing or sued in a representative character.
- All of the above.
- Confessions made to a Magistrate.
- Confessions made to a police Office.
- Confession made to any person outside the court.
- Confession made to a religious guru.
- Civil proceedings only.
- Criminal proceedings only.
- Criminal as well as criminal proceedings.
- Marital proceedings only.
- Relevant but unsafe.
- A conclusive proof.
- Supportive and corroborative in nature.
- Both a and c.
- District Magistrate.
- State Government after consultation with the High Court.
- High court.
- Supreme Court.
- A police officer.
- A Magistrate.
- A private person.
- All of the above.
- Search of person: Section 100(3).
- Witness of search: Section 100(4).
- Signature and attendance of witnesses: Section 100(5).
- None of the above.
- A Magistrate may order such monthly rate as he thinks fit.
- A Magistrate can order the payment of interim maintenance and expenses of the proceedings.
- Both 1 and 2.
- Only 1.
- Judicial Magistrate.
- Metropolitan Magistrate.
- Executive Magistrate
- None of the above.
- Legitimate minor child.
- Illegitimate minor child.
- Unborn child.
- Married minor daughter.
- A statement given to the police after investigation have commenced.
- A statement recorded by an officer-in-charge on the basis of his personal knowledge after the original information was received.
- A complaint made orally or in writing to a Magistrate.
- All of the above.
Comments
Post a Comment